Declaration of American Values
Last week's Strang Report about the July 1 Denver meeting with the evangelical leaders received wide coverage. Associated Press quoted the Strang Report since I was the only one who reported from actually inside the meeting. At the end of the blog there are several links to articles that were written if you're interested in reading them.
Because I was the only person who was both at the June 10 meeting that Senator Barack Obama had with evangelical leaders in Chicago and the July 1 meeting in Denver I found myself being interviewed by numerous reporters. As a former reporter myself it's an odd feeling to be on the other side of the interview process.
At the Denver meeting organizer Mat Staver handed out a Declaration of American Values. There was some discussion and debate about some wording and it was referred to a small committee to take into consideration the suggestions that were made. Because the final report was not ready last Wednesday when I wrote my last Strang Report, I'm including it below.
Meanwhile, I'm still trying to get interviews with both Senator Barack Obama and Senator John McCain. I've received tentative approval from staff members in both campaigns for an interview. I'm eager to interview each candidate and report what they say.
Meanwhile, my son Cameron, Founder and Publisher of Relevant magazine was able to interview Senator Obama last week by telephone. His report was picked up by several of the major news services. Because his interview made Obama look more moderate on both abortion and same-sex marriage, it made the radical left go crazy (according to many of the blog postings that were written) as they are upset that their champion is moving toward the center. At the same time some on the right are horrified to read any depiction about Obama that is not extreme, concerned that some Christians may decide to back him.
You can click here to read Cameron's report.
Click here to read the articles that quoted last week’s “Strang Report.”
http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/07/christian_conservatives_unitin.html
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jrzRNJWPgYEArLcxWtJSmGR-3nFgD91M2DAO0
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/07/john-mccain-con.html
Here is the Declaration of American Values. Feel free to add your comments below in our blog.
Declaration of American Values
We the people of the United States of America, at this crucial time in history, do hereby affirm the core consensus values which form the basis of America’s greatness, that all men and women from every race and ethnicity are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We adhere to the rule of law embodied in the Constitution of the United States and to the principles of liberty on which America was founded. In order to maintain the blessings of liberty and justice for ourselves and our posterity, and recognizing that personal responsibility is the basis of our selfgoverning Nation, we declare our allegiance –
We hereby pledge our Names, our Lives and our Sacred Honor to this Declaration of American Values.
11 Comments:
At July 7, 2008 1:48 PM ,
A Voice in Atlanta said...
Cover to cover, Old Testament and New, the Bible is filled with admonition to care for the poor yet this declaration says not a word about it. Why is this? It's simply because caring for the poor is an issue that falls on the political left and, as such, will not be embraced by many evangelicals who continue to stride lockstep with the Republican Party. Wouldn't it be nice to use the Bible as a guide for Declarations like this instead of pure conservative politics? A Declaration from the Black Church in America might read quite differently. A combination of those two would be a worthy Declaration I'd fully support.
At July 7, 2008 2:29 PM ,
Matt Green said...
Once again, this "declaration" reveals the glaring problem with the Christian right: the conflation of biblical values (e.g. life and marriage) with conservative political values (e.g. low taxes and strong national defense) and the glaring absence of other biblical values (e.g. creation stewardship and care for the poor). The church can not be prophetic if it is tied so strongly to a single political platform and does not present an agenda that confronts the moral bankruptcy of both parties.
At July 7, 2008 4:50 PM ,
daly.de.gagne@gmail.com said...
I believe that Charisma could borrow a page -- or several -- from Sojourners Magazine, which proves there are progressive evangelicals who focus on more than the moral issues related to family and sexuality. Perhaps it is worth noting the obvious -- that severe poverty can do as much to undermine good, wholesome family life as anything else.
Marx was right about one thing -- people tend to reflect the interests of whatever class they are in. Thus it is not surprising to find that the major spokespeople for the evangelical movement that find themselves fairly affluent tend to reflect the vested interests of people who are fairly affluent.
There is so much more that can be done, and as "a voice in Atlanta" says, "a declaration from the Black Church in America might read quite differently." Matt talks about "the absence of other biblical values," and he is on the money also. The values that tend to be absent are the ones that could result in higher taxes, enhanced social services, and major changes in such things as the judicial system (that goes against the conservative mindset of more jails, longer terms, etc.).
I feel good to be a charismatic Christian, but I cringe when the wealthy, business-oriented spokespeople of the tradition open their mouths to talk politics. No matter how moralistic and righteous they are about family values and evolution and homsexuality, somehow they do not quite sound the same note that I suspect Jesus would, if He was talking to the candidates, or about their platforms.
Daly
At July 7, 2008 8:55 PM ,
A Voice in Atlanta said...
Daly, I'm also a spirit-filled Christian who believes, like you & Matt, that the church has to gain much more balance and maturity when it comes to politics. A good read is the book "Unchristian." I recommend it. Sojourners is seeking more balance--maybe going too far in seeking that but at least they are asking the right questions. I believe there may be many believers who will have a tough time sorting out the two candidates--I'm one of them. The easy road is take the party line & vote Republican. The truth is, however, that I oppose Obama when it comes to his stand on abortion and gay rights but think he's on the mark when it comes to Iraq (which in my view was a big mistake that has cost many lives & not made the world a safer place). Also, Obama--as the Democrats usually do--will take action to help the poor, whether in the mortgage crisis or other issues. Proverbs says he who gives to the poor lends to God. That's true with individuals but maybe nations too--if a government has compassion on the poor, maybe they are inviting the blessing of God. So who to vote for? I'm still not sure but it's progress, I think, for believers to study both candidates, pray, & vote accordingly instead of casting the same old straight Republican vote as this Declaration encourages them to do.
At July 8, 2008 3:26 PM ,
daly.de.gagne@gmail.com said...
Dear Voice in Atlanta,
I appreciate your sharing. Hey, I just noticed that your handle forms the acronym VIA, or the Way -- kind of neat!
I think you hit the political crux of the matter when you look at the issues on both the Republican and Democratic sides. For me the question would be, where do you think Jesus would put His emphasis if He was here today?
I do not think He would talk about family values without talking about poverty, or how big companies have replaced permanent work with part time jobs so they don't have to pay benefits to employees, and how this has resulted in a whole new class of working poor. I think Jesus would be outraged that we have found the best way to deal with criminals is to warehouse them for longer and longer periods of time. I think Jesus would be outraged at how much emphasis people put on homosexuality and evolution while saying relatively little about children who don't have enough to eat, about pimps who peddle sex with children, about the laughable nature of the war on drugs (while often opposing harm reduction programs that have been shown to reduce drug use), about homelessness, about the way the mentally ill are treated, about the war in Iraq, about gang warfare on the street lead by some of the nation's smartest kids, who at a young age are filled with despair and hate, about parents and other adults who sexually abuse children, etc.
I suspect Jesus' agenda is just too tough, and too down to earth for many church leaders, whether they are old-line denominational liberals and evangelicals, or part of the new charismatic movement.
When was the last time you heard one of our leaders being chastised for hanging out with prostitutes and drunks?
Daly
At July 10, 2008 10:37 AM ,
Stephen said...
I'm surprised that these comments all blast the "Declaration" for not mentioning the poor, when in the 1st paragraph it states "Every person is made in the image of God, and it is the responsibility and duty of all individuals and communities of faith to extend the hand of loving compassion to care for those in poverty and distress."
Does it not say enough, or was this possibly overlooked?
Personally, my issues with the government's handling of "poverty programs" are a) that they are ineffective, inefficient and offer no hope to those they should be helping and b) that they seem to lead to an attitude of "I gave at the office" or "I did my part by paying taxes" and therefore fewer people personally becoming involved in changing lives.
It is an American tragedy that we have 2nd and 3rd generations of people mired in hopelessness, living in ghettos and housing projects, and the best response we can offer is a check in the mail.
The greatest hope we can offer the hopeless is the love and salvation that only comes from our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Regardless of how someone may feel about government programs for the poor, they can only be really reached and their lives permanently changed when people get personally involved and tell them about Christ. And while we're at it, our actions should match our words.
At July 10, 2008 6:01 PM ,
Jim DeGraaf said...
Thank you, Stephen!! Finally a voice of common sense in the "wilderness"! Let me take it another step. I submit that the faithful and relentless application of the first three bullet points in this declaration alone would reduce poverty in our society (and most any society that practiced them) significantly. The fact is that divorce, resulting in single parent homes headed primarily by females contributes more toward poverty than virtually any other single factor. This is not a gender biased, right wing, hateful, etc., etc. remark. It is well researched, well documented fact. Before anyone goes ballistic, just Google the words "divorce and poverty" and read it for yourself. These three words resulted in 250,000 entries. Here is just one entry among thousands to get you started - just copy and paste the link into your browser: http://www.divorcereform.org/pov.html
Furthermore, I submit that a government that is callous to the scourge of aborted children (1.2 million in 2005 in the U.S.), truly the most defenseless among us, cannot, MUST not, be entrusted with the care of the poor, homeless, aged, and ill. Again, the Democrat Party and Senator Obama have a well documented stance on this issue (in SPITE of what he says now). Open your eyes, folks, and look for the root causes. The evidence isn't hard to find.
At July 11, 2008 12:28 PM ,
Nick said...
Quote:
"At the same time some on the right are horrified to read any depiction about Obama that is not extreme, concerned that some Christians may decide to back him."
By all means let's not allow Obama to change. No one should be permitted to become more compassionate, or centrist, or Christ-like.
Wait !! Isn't that the bedrock of our belief ?? That we daily look for ways to change ourselves in order to better show God's grace and love ? Since so few of us are perfect, for most of us that will mean an on-going proces of change.
Why is it that Christ demands we change, and yet so many of his American followers are hostile to change in others ??? Odd, don't ya think ?
Nickatnight
At July 16, 2008 4:52 PM ,
Stephen said...
Nick At Night Says:
"Why is it that Christ demands we change, and yet so many of his American followers are hostile to change in others ??? Odd, don't ya think ?"
Nick there is a difference between changing to be more like Christ, and changing for the sole purpose of being elected to office.
At August 5, 2008 5:22 PM ,
DD in AZ said...
Amen Stephen! Yes so true. Obama has changed his position many times to get the vote. Sorry that doesn't cut it for me. I have a moral responsibility as a Christian to vote for those who are likeminded. We have to keep these morals issues out front...we have to. Its just too important.
Part of our responsibilities as Christians is the remember and care for the poor in spirit. We have to be a guide, a light, offer hope. Sending a check isn't enough...we need to be apart of creating change by instilling hope. True Hope. Hope in the Lord Jesus Christ.
At August 20, 2008 6:51 AM ,
Chris said...
strong military and secure borders is now a christian value? lol.
only from the hateful "christian" political right, which has very little in common with Christ's teachings.
Post a Comment
<< Home